Blog Entry

SD probably won't give V-Jax a long-term deal

Posted on: December 20, 2010 9:36 pm
 
V. Jackson likely won't be getting a long-term deal from San Diego (US Presswire). Posted by Josh Katzowitz

Even after his spectacular performance last week in the Chargers win against the 49ers – WR Vincent Jackson recorded five catches for 112 yards and three touchdowns in his second game of the season – San Diego probably won’t want to sign Jackson to a long-term contract.

As the San Diego Union Tribune points out, the Chargers could be scared off by his personal history (two DUI arrests and driving with a suspended license) and the fact they’d have to pay him a megaton of money for a guy they probably consider unreliable.

But if the next Collective Bargaining Agreement continues the use of the franchise tag, there’s a pretty good chance San Diego would hand off that designation to Jackson.

The Union Tribune explains:

First, no one is certain what a tag would look like (and if there will even be one) under a new CBA. And even if the franchise tag rules remain the same, the Chargers would have to choose between putting the exclusive or non-exclusive tag on Jackson.

The exclusive tag would mean Jackson would be guaranteed a one-year salary worth the average of the five highest-paid receivers (expected to be more than $10 million) but be unable to negotiate with any other teams. A non-exclusive tag would mean he gets the $10 mil-plus salary but would be able to negotiate with other teams. If he did agree to a contract with another team, the Chargers would be able to match the offer to keep him (not going to happen) or be entitled to two first-round picks as compensation for losing him.

While there is no consideration currently to ever give Jackson a long-term deal, a tag also gives everyone time to see if Jackson stays clean. It is a concern – not just in the Chargers front office but around the NFL – that another serious legal issue for Jackson would result in him being suspended for a full year. The only thing that would bring leniency and calm fears is more time having passed.

A franchise tag would not sit well with Jackson, but then again, he hasn’t exactly been a model NFL player/citizen either, so who else could he blame but himself?

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS Feed .
Comments

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: January 12, 2012 1:35 pm
 

SD probably won't give V-Jax a long-term deal

This particular issue had to be particularly successfully published, and, it conveys quite a lot of valuable info. I've highly recommended Super Bowl Jersey your ultimate proclaimed seems to indicate of constructing such be able to write.



dsfjwerw
Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: January 6, 2012 12:22 pm
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator



The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com