Blog Entry

NFLPA votes conditionally on settlement agreement

Posted on: July 20, 2011 4:17 pm
Edited on: July 20, 2011 5:41 pm
  •  
 
Posted by Eye on Football Staff

Update (5:05): There are multiple outlets reporting that the players are leaving their meetings without voting today.

CBSSports.com's own Mike Freeman has learned this is because of the "massive volume of information" they're having to currently digest (mentally, of course) when looking over the settlement documents.

There is also a report from SI's Jim Trotter (since confirmed by the NFL Network's Albert Breer) where he cites sources who said that the players voted "conditionally" to "forward the settlement agreement to named plaintiffs." The conditions being that some outstanding issues be resolved before the vote is official.

In other words, the guys listed on Brady v. NFL -- Tom Brady, Vincent Jackson, Logan Mankins, Peyton Manning, Drew Brees -- will get a chance to review the settlement agreement and progress the settlement talks forward while the NFLPA continues to review the documents on hand.

All of this means it's possible -- and perhaps even likely -- that we see the owners and players vote on the CBA on the same day, Thursday. It also means if you had "Wednesday, July 20" in your office lockout pool, you just lost.
-----

Earlier today, we told you about NFLPA president Kevin Mawae saying the association wouldn’t be tied to a deadline of July 21 to hold a vote on a new labor deal.

"Our timeline is to get the best deal for our players,” he said. “We're not going to agree to any deal unless it's the right deal for all the players."

Apparently, the players haven’t agreed that the proposed deal is, in fact, the right deal for them.

As the various reporters in Washington who are waiting for the NFLPA to finish their meeting (and maybe vote one way or the other) have spoken and tweeted, there has been no vote taken today.

And by the reports that some players, including Bengals T Andrew Whitworth, have left the building, it's unclear at this point whether the owners will have the chance to vote on ending the labor struggle at their meeting Thursday in Atlanta.

That’s not to say the deal won’t be passed by the NFLPA at some point soon. Hell, it's possible the vote still takes place today. It’s just taking a little bit longer than some thought it might.

Which, in this labor environment, is pretty much par for the course.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS Feed.
  •  
Category: NFL
Comments
fghdfre
Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: January 2, 2012 7:17 am
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator



hgtrerte
Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 27, 2011 9:48 am
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator



tomlye
Since: Nov 28, 2011
Posted on: November 30, 2011 9:10 am
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator




Since: Oct 16, 2010
Posted on: July 20, 2011 6:25 pm
 

NFLPA votes conditionally on settlement agreement

m

m...I think this revenue split fairly distributes the increasing televison revenues, but I better run it by Santana Moss first."

I concur sir !



Since: Sep 5, 2006
Posted on: July 20, 2011 6:14 pm
 

NFLPA votes conditionally on settlement agreement

Super. But do the players even know what they're looking at? You either trust your union head and legal team to get you the best deal possible or you don't. Simple as that. Now we have football players scanning a CBA that it took two teams of men with law degrees months to put together? And they're going to have all 400 or so pages "digested" by tomorrow? Come on. That's like Bart trading lunches with the advanced class he had no business being in.

"Hmmm...I think this revenue split fairly distributes the increasing televison revenues, but I better run it by Santana Moss first."



The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com