Blog Entry

Still no agreement on HGH testing

Posted on: August 25, 2011 9:06 am
Edited on: August 25, 2011 10:40 am
  •  
 
Goodell, SmithPosted by Josh Katzowitz

Lost in all the hubbub of the preseason (We’ve got football back, y’all!) and the back-patting that came out with the emergence of the new CBA was that there were still some unresolved issues that the owners and the newly-reformed players union would have to negotiate and agree upon before everybody could truly move forward.

One of those issues is the introduction of HGH testing.

The NFL has thought along that the testing for human growth hormone was necessary, and Roger Goodell was touting all the way back in March that the owners were “going to ensure it gets done.” The NFLPA, on the other hand, has gone on record as far back as 2006, saying testing for HGH (involving taking blood from players) was too invasive.

On Wednesday, the two sides met with the World Anti-Doping Agency in Montreal, and as the Washington Post writes, the NFLPA was unsatisfied with how blood testing on players would be conducted. Naturally, no agreement has been reached, and the union still has questions about the reliability of the tests and what kind of rights the players have not to be stuck with needles.

HGH Testing
“We have an obligation as a union to protect the integrity of the game,” said George Atallah, an NFLPA spokesman. “But we are disappointed in the lack of transparency related to the fundamental information required to begin HGH testing … As soon as there is a fair, safe and reliable testing protocol that’s rooted in science” the union will agree to testing.

The “rooted in science” quote is interesting, considering David Howman, the WADA director general, told the Post that “all the scientists in the room” thought the testing process was clear-cut and that the union was taking “a very strange approach” to the issue if the players, in fact, want HGH testing.

As CBSSports.com’s Mike Freeman writes today, “For a system to be inserted it had to be done by the season opener. Well, according to one official close to the talks, that seems unlikely. Things could easily change and the two sides still have several weeks to work something out but the union remains unconvinced, I'm told, about the accuracy of the test.”

Do the players even want testing? I’m not sure. The union might talk a good game about having to clean up football and making sure nobody is gaining an unfair advantage by using HGH. But the NFLPA has been very slow to come around on this issue, and you have to wonder what exactly it will take for the union to give its OK to HGH testing.

If the World Anti-Doping Agency can’t convince the NFLPA, what will?

UPDATED (10:33 a.m. ET): To answer that question, perhaps we can glean the answer from this passage in an APstory (emphasis mine).
Among those representing the union were outside counsel Maurice Suh, who represented disgraced cyclist Floyd Landis, who was stripped of his 2006 Tour de France win for doping, and scientists Paul Scott, Tim Roberts and Dennis Crouch of Aegis Lab in Nashville.

The NFLPA had asked WADA for information on how the testing works, the rate of reliability and for data on the safety of the HGH test. The person said none of that information was made available Wednesday.

Another person familiar with the talks, however, said Scott, Roberts and Crouch were given an opportunity to ask questions after getting a summary of data from WADA, but did not.

According to a CBSSports.com source, the NFLPA asked for this information (how the test works and other data points) weeks ago but has yet to receive an answer. That apparently is the big reason why the NFLPA is still hesitant to agree to this kind of testing right now.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @EyeOnNFL on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS Feed.
  •  
Comments

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: January 17, 2012 2:22 am
 

Still no agreement on HGH testing



hgtrerte
Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 26, 2011 2:06 pm
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator



tomlye
Since: Nov 28, 2011
Posted on: November 29, 2011 11:25 am
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator




Since: Sep 2, 2011
Posted on: September 3, 2011 12:00 am
 

Discount Oakley Sunglasses Fake Oakleys

 PR:  I:  L:  LD:  I: <a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=site%3Aeye-on-football.blogs.cbssports.com&FORM=QBRE&mkt=en-US" target="_blank">6,270 Rank:  Age:  I:  Robo: Sitemap:  Rank:  Price: Links: |




Since: Sep 5, 2008
Posted on: August 25, 2011 11:23 am
 

Still no agreement on HGH testing

The reason it's NOT been a done deal already is because the Owners want it so that means the Players are automatically against it.  Come up with whatever excuse you want, to invasive, not totally conclusive, invasion of privacy, whatever, it's all comes back to one side versus the other.  How about giving the FANS a list of players names that are against the testing.  Who and why wouldn't they want it?  What player wouldn't want to kick a CHEATER out of the game?  Let's not play Dem against Rep and disagree just for the sake of disagreement, leave the idiots in DC and let's get rid of the players that have no respect for the game, the fans, and themselves.  Test em and then boot em, if they can't play clean we as fans don't want to watch and support them.


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com