Hello these types of a remarkable publish I've obtain in addition believe in me I've been searching about for this connected form of write-up pertaining to latest weekly as well as not observed out about this. Many thanks for you and can hunt for further more posts inside of you.

The Patriot's Richard Seymore faked an injury against Peyton and the Colts one year, but it wasn't as bad a fake job as the two Giants falling like wounded goats last week. As bad and funny as it looks, faking injuries is not illegal by league rules. Until the NFL changes that rule to stop teams from faking to stop play, teams will continue to do it. When a team is beating your defenses a$$es off with a no huddle offense, that is the only way to stop play. Manning, Brady, Rivers, Brees, and all the better QBs use no huddle all the time. There are enough cameras watching play to determine whether a player is really injured or if he is seeking an Academy Award to stop play.

Faking an injury then coming in a play or two later is super weak. I hope the fans and the commishioner condems & stops all the blatent acting. The players that do it should be publically identified by the league and fined then suspended for repeated occurances, the teams should also face penalties

I am not a fan of the Colts at all, but it makes sense that THE team, who most wants to slow things down by faking injuries, would play against Manning...Twice a year. I can't think of anyone, who in previous years (obviously this year, Brady is playing more up-tempo, on par with Manning's pace in previous years), played a more up-tempo game than the Colts, so who would you want to slow down the most? Someone in their division.

Also, to use your examples:  A fender bender  once a week with your rival neighbor next door who you never get along with, or a car totalling accident with some guy you see once a month driving down your street as you back out of your driveway?  Which one would you complain about more?  Me personally, I would point out that my neighbor who dislikes me continues to hit my car, probably costing me more in the long run.  The second example is two extremes and an example I would call apples and oranges.  However, one I can relate would be, A cold or the Flu, in which I would respond:  A cold you get once a week as apposed to the Flu you get once a year...hmmmmm, I would mention the cold I get once a week as more of a menace than the flu.  Thanks for the comparisons, I don't think I could have made my point more clearer without them.

I fully get what you meant, however, I don't think you are taking the interview into perspective.  You seem to think it was a break down of his entire career, or even better yet, something he has been stewing on for years.  I happen to beleive he was asked a question about the subject and simply recalled the Texans as repeat perpetrators becau
se he beleived they had a signal for it.  That would make the Texans use of the cheat as intent to cheat.  To explain in terms most might recognize, murdering someone is bad, but intending to murder someone is worse.  Get it?  All teams do it in some form or fashion, but I would venture to guess that no other team has a signal for it; However, I would also say that teams with experienced players know when they are in trouble and would responsibly and SMARTLY do it.  I would call someone being completely winded as an injury and tell them that if they can't muster up enough energy to run full steam on the nest play to go down with an injury.  Tust me, heart attacks have happened in less stressful environments, so going down because you're completely winded is fine with me.  I will also say this, the rule should be changed.  In my opinion, injuries of a non-contact nature, i.e. ones where a player just goes down but is obviously moving around, like from a cramp, should be moved off the field expeditiously.  The team can be allowed to run a man on the field but as soon as the whistle blows, which would be when the "injured" individual is officially off the field the offense can immiedatly snap the ball.  This still applys pressure to the defense because it doesn't give them enough time to spin up replacement player and the defense will still be a little gassed.  Nonetheless, it's something that should be addressed so teams that use the no huddle well keep their advantage.  My two cents....

Dungy...