Blog Entry

NFL Winners/Losers and experts live chat

Posted on: October 4, 2011 12:03 pm
Edited on: October 5, 2011 1:05 pm
  •  
 


Posted by Will Brinson



The world is a far better place when there are clear and distinct delineations between who is a winner and who is a loser. Since actual football records only do so much of that for us, let's dive into who's winning and who's losing a quarter of the way into the 2011 NFL season.

BUT FIRST -- we need to talk. No, seriously, let's chat -- starting at 1:00 pm ET on Wednesday. You can tell Pete Prisco his Power Rankings are awful, ask fantasy questions or just yell at me for not including [insert your favorite player's name here] in the winners list below. Either way, come on by.



WINNERS
Carolina Panthers: Yes, the Panthers are 1-3 and that is not what you would call winning. But this season, thanks solely to the early emergence of Cam Newton, is already eleventy billion times better than 2010, when the Panthers went 2-14. In fact, I'd argue that Carolina could lose out the rest of their schedule -- and they could! -- and it would be a better season than last year, when they despondently limped to the worst record in the NFL. There are plenty of arguments to be made against Newton's performance thus far (namely: he's posting some garbage-time stats and he's made plenty of rookie mistakes), but there's little doubt that Carolina landed themselves a franchise quarterback, and did so at a very reasonable cost.

Detroit Lions: This is a case where the record actually does match up with the placement. Matthew Stafford could go here, as he's proving himself to be a potentially elite quarterback. So could Calvin Johnson, who's vaulted himself into the pole position when it comes to wide receivers in the NFL. And so could Jim Schwartz, as he's clearly the best "new" head coach in the NFL. Which is why the organization as a whole gets the nod, since they've somehow managed to justify the hype and make the early Thanksgiving game -- a Packers-Lions matchup -- more meaningful than it's been in years.

Ryan Fitzpatrick/Fred Jackson: The oft-overlooked offensive duo that drives the Buffalo Bills are in full-on resurgence mode early in the season, with Jackson sitting at fourth in the NFL in rushing yards being the most obvious example. Fitzpatrick's been pretty spectacular himself even if his total passing yardage only ranks him 13th in the NFL. Passing yards can be misleading anyway -- he's thrown nine touchdowns to three interceptions and completed 63.4 percent of his passes. Most importantly, the Buffalo Bills are 3-1, something no one saw coming. They were so hot at one point this season that Fitzpatrick was impossible to book for an interview this season and both he and Jackson are working their way towards new, big-money contracts.

Matt Hasselbeck: Mentioned it in Sorting the Sunday Pile, but Hasselbeck is seeing a serious return to dominance as a result of his move to Tennessee. He's got 1,152 yards in just four games -- last season he barely crossed over 3,000 in 14. His average yards per pass is all the way up to 8.9, and his passing yards per game, 288, is currently the highest of his career. It helps to play for a coach that puts an emphasis on the offensive line, of course, and is willing to keep blockers at home in order to make sure Hasselbeck doesn't get touched and is able to throw the ball deep.

Darren Sproles: Arguably "the Saints" could be on this list ... just for landing Sproles. Has a guy ever fit what Sean Payton wants to do better than the diminutive Kansas State-star-turned-Chargers specialist? We used to think that Reggie Bush was the king of Payton's offensive scheming, and he did fit what the offensive guru loves to do, but Sproles, with better big-play burst, is the perfect addition to the already explosive Saints.

Gary Kubiak: First of all, kudos to the Texans for correctly playing the 2011 offseason. We've said this before, but they failed to draft for secondary help, which seemed weird, but now looks genius, especially since they went out and signed Johnathan Joseph in free agency. He's been a difference maker for Houston, and not just because he represents better value than Nnamdi Asomugha already. Kubes, on the other hand, is sitting at 3-1 and has a pretty clear path to a division title, the Titans success notwithstanding. Obviously the Texans aren't locked into the 2011 playoffs just yet, but their chances are looking pretty good right now, and that'll do a lot to justify his return for this season.

Matt Forte: Another topic in this past week's SSP, Forte is mauling defenses this year -- even if they are the Panthers! -- and forcing the Bears to pay him this offseason. For whatever reason, Chicago believed that Forte wasn't worth the cash and didn't pony up before 2011 began. That's fine, and that's their prerogative. But if they want to keep him, Forte's success this year is going to make it expensive.

NFL Fans: In just a few hectic weeks, fans of football went from "OMG, we might not get football at all this year" to "OMG, football is more exciting to watch than at any period of time, ever." We've seen scoring cranked up, we've seen incredible storylines (Lions, Bills, oh my), we've seen incredible comebacks (four 20-pointers in the last two weeks) and we've seen no truly noticeable ill effects of the missed offseason. If there are any complaints, it might be the new kickoff rules and the lack of consistency on replays. The former everyone who's not over now will be over by the end of the year, and the latter can be fixed. It's a good time to be an NFL fan.

LOSERS
Todd Haley: That Haley ended the quarter-season mark on a high note, with a victory over Minnesota, is a good thing. Otherwise the Chiefs might be starting at an 0-4 start and his seat would be somehow be hotter. It's really an unfathomable dropoff from winning the division in 2010. Haley's been victimized by a lot of key injuries -- Eric Berry, Tony Moeaki and Jamaal Charles all went down for the year -- but things weren't all that good with the win against Minny, as Haley managed to get in a screaming match with Matt Cassel.

Tony Romo: It amazes me that Romo can't do anything right. Or, maybe, he can't avoid whatever he does being scrutinized to the nth degree. After Week 1, when he threw a terrible pick against the Jets that cost him the game, he was a goat. Then he injured his ribs against the 49ers, led the Cowboys to victory and he was a hero. Then he played with busted ribs against the Redskins, overcame his entire team stinking the joint up and morphed into a different person that we knew.  Then came the Lions loss. Romo tossed back-to-back picks that Detroit took to the house and everyone hopped off the "I heart Romo" bandwagon and back on the "Choker" train. It's not fair to Romo because it's not all his fault, but none of that matters to anyone that applies the labels.

Ben Roethlisberger: For years, the Steelers have managed to succeed despite a porous offensive line. That's mainly because Roethlisberger's strength is keeping a play alive by being a physical beast. But even he's struggling to fight through the Steelers inability to block, and suddenly Pittsburgh's in a precarious position at 2-2 with Roethlisberger banged up. Of course, he missed time for non-injury reasons last year, and he also suffered through injuries and the Steelers line was also terrible last season. Still, it's hard to fathom Roethlisberger staying healthy if he keeps getting destroyed at this rate.

Kyle Orton/Donovan McNabb: Because quarterbacks seem to be succeeding at an earlier stage than ever before, there's immediate cries for the next guy any time a veteran struggles. Orton and McNabb, neither of whom is putting up great numbers thus far in 2011, are the best examples because of the two guys -- Tim Tebow and Christian Ponder, respectively -- who sit behind them. Both Orton and McNabb are slightly under 60 percent in terms of completion percentage this season, and while neither one is lighting up the scoreboard with touchdown passes and passing yardage, it's important to remember that one (Orton) is running a John Fox offense and the other (McNabb) is on a team with Adrian Peterson.

Juan Castillo: The Eagles shipped out Sean McDermont because Jim Johnson's shadow was too much to overcome. And then they brought in Castillo, who coached Philly's offensive line for 12 years. Yes, that's offensive line. Given that the Eagles added both Nnamdi Asomugha and Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie in the offseason, it looked like it might not matter. But Castillo's new-age "don't tackle" defense hasn't gone over well against an opponent yet, and the Eagles find themselves 1-3 primarily because they simply can't stop anyone. Sure, they're tough to pass on ... unless you have a good tight end. And if you don't, and you happen to have a decent power running game, you don't even have to worry about it.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @EyeOnNFL on Twitter, subscribe to our NFL newsletter, and while you're add it, add our RSS Feed.
  •  
Comments

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: January 16, 2012 1:00 am
 

NFL Winners/Losers and experts live chat




Since: Nov 19, 2011
Posted on: December 25, 2011 2:00 am
 

NFL Winners/Losers and experts live chat

I've obtained to are grateful for this phenomenal world-wide-web web page .I really with out a doubt extremely loved each small the merchandise. I've most individuals bookmarked net web site to find considering the most current concerns you place up.



Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 4, 2011 5:20 pm
 

NFL Winners/Losers and experts live chat

All of us search at you put forward . this approach basically is certainly educational and particularly beneficial.. I need to fully grasp considerably more associated with corresponding world-wide-web special promotion.. A lot of many thanks for featuring your company interesting practical knowledge on this ..


tomlye
Since: Nov 28, 2011
Posted on: November 28, 2011 10:33 am
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator




Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posted on: October 5, 2011 9:23 pm
 

NFL Winners/Losers and experts live chat

Let's say Romo throws ZERO interceptions.


Dallas then goes on to win 41-10 and Lion fans go into hiding in Bin Laden's old caves.


  



Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posted on: October 5, 2011 9:21 pm
 

NFL Winners/Losers and experts live chat

There's no need to blame Garrett because Romo is SUPPOSED to be a mature, RESPONSIBLE quarterback. If running the ball with a huge lead GUARANTEES a win, then why doesn't every team with a lead does it??? Why don't the Packers, who can't run through a wet piece of tissue, do it? They don't have to do it because Rodgers is SMART and RELIABLE...unlike Romo. I just watched the Lions/Cowboys game on NFL Replay. The Dallas D was all over Stafford, yet he was throwing the ball away, even while trailing by two scores. Let me say that again.


STAFFORD WAS THROWING THE BALL AWAY, EVEN WHILE DOWN BY TWO SCORES.     


Romo, on the other hand, thinks gambling with other people's rent money is the cool thing to do, DESPITE HAVING A 27-3 LEAD THAT THE WHOLE TEAM HELP BUILD. Instead, he makes an as$ of himself and the rest is history.

  



Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posted on: October 5, 2011 9:14 pm
 

NFL Winners/Losers and experts live chat

Lion_Diehard (snicker), you are a poorly raised MO.RON. If I ever saw your parents I would slap both of them for such a terrible job. Your Lions were getting BEATEN TO DEATH.....LITERALLY. 27-3 and Dallas was driving again. Then the BONEHEAD decides to be stupid.

Boy, I wished Suh would've blasted him just once after halftime. Just enough to sideline him for a couple of series. By that point, Garrett might've yanked him for cautionary reasons. Dallas then goes on to win, and all this 'Lions are for real' talk vanishes in thin air.

 



Since: Oct 29, 2010
Posted on: October 5, 2011 7:52 pm
 

NFL Winners/Losers and experts live chat

the Chargers have a winning record after 4 games. That doesnt happen very often.....fn Norv



Since: Feb 25, 2009
Posted on: October 5, 2011 4:33 pm
 

NFL Winners/Losers and experts live chat

Cam Newton has accumulated garbage time stats?  How?  The Panthers were in position to win or tie in each of their losses in the final minutes.
Yeah, i thought that was strange, too. Newton has only had one "garbage time" game. The rest were close enough that the opposing team were playing full-on. In fact, the Panthers have blown several leads, forcing Newton to keep throwing. Shades of Kyle Orton.



Since: Nov 11, 2008
Posted on: October 5, 2011 4:21 pm
 

NFL Winners/Losers and experts live chat

how about ravens D as winners. 3 out of 4 DPOW in AFC have come from Baltimore


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com