Tag:Brett Favre
Posted on: August 28, 2010 11:11 pm

Favre not as bad as boxscore might suggest

Posted by Andy Benoit

Brett Favre turned the ball over three times in his 2010 home debut – and all three were of especially poor form. Favre failed to protect the ball on a sack-fumble on the opening drive. B. Favre

His first interception was returned 91 yards for a touchdown by Earl Thomas (Thomas had a fantastic all-around game, by the way; his hitting was terrific).

Favre’s second pick – which landed in the arms of Marcus Trufant – was the result of a deep ball being overthrown by 10 yards.

Of course, the standard line applies here: IT’S JUST THE PRESEASON. But more reassuring to Viking fans than that is the fact that Favre looked sharp when he wasn’t turning the ball over. He was 16/26 passing for 187 yards, showing great velocity and accuracy on timing-based throws.

Favre’s performance seemed especially impressive once Tarvaris Jackson took the field. On Jackson’s first series, we got to see what happens when a semi-erratic passer with just so-so pocket awareness gets flustered.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS feed.

Posted on: August 28, 2010 8:20 pm

Harvin playing, making impact

Posted by Andy Benoit

The Minnesota Vikings are making their home debut tonight against the Seattle Seahawks. Not only is Brett Favre on the field (looks like he’s still coming back this season after all), but so is wide receiver Percy Harvin.

The second-year sensation has barely practiced the past several weeks, thanks to the death of his grandmother in July and severe migraines. Unofficially, Harvin made it through only two practices during Vikings training camp.

Harvin had a 34-yard catch-and-run on Minnesota’s opening drive. It led to no points, however, as, just a few plays later, Favre fumbled while being sacked by Seahawks defensive tackle Colin Cole.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS feed.

Posted on: August 25, 2010 5:16 pm
Edited on: August 25, 2010 5:20 pm

Sidney Rice: New MRI showed 'significant changes'

Posted by Will Brinson

Much ado has been made about Sidney Rice's hip injury: it will sideline him for half the season , it caused the Vikings to trade for Greg Camarillo, and it has generated plenty of speculation -- from media members and head coach Brad Childress -- as to whether or not Rice could have had surgery sooner in order to be ready for 2010.

Two particularly damning theories are that a) no one wanted Brett Favre to hear about the severity of the hip problem and b) Rice didn't want to return until he got more money from the Vikings. On Wednesday, Rice opened up the proverbial horse's mouth and got his blog on .

"Like a week and a half ago I went back to see the doctor for another MRI and he said it showed significant changes," Rice wrote on SidneyRice.18.com "It was something he thought would be a serious problem if I didn’t get it taken care of right then, a problem that could shorten my career."

Rice adds that he "talked to a couple of my teammates ... and our trainers" and everyone was on board that it was better for Rice to be able to finish the season healthy, as opposed to risk further injury. It's fairly safe to say that he also spoke with his agent, Drew Rosenhaus, about risking his career without a new contract.

Interestingly, Rice also addressed the contract situation, writing that "People are going to say what they want to say about my contract or whatever, I'm not really worried about that at this point. My main focus is getting back on the field" and playing like he did last year.

Look, the timing of Rice's surgery, regardless of what he writes on his website, is awkward. It's nightmarish for the team, a disaster for Brad Childress and while relatively amusing, probably pretty frustrating for Brett Favre.

But if in fact Rice's timeline is correct/accurate/etc, and if in fact he learned last week that playing this year, sans surgery, could result in potentially career-ending injury, there's zero question that his decision to undergo surgery this week was the right one.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS Feed .
Posted on: August 24, 2010 1:11 pm
Edited on: August 24, 2010 1:18 pm

Vikings should make a play for Bolts' Jackson

Posted by Will Brinson

The news that 2009 Pro Bowler Sidney Rice will miss at least half the regular after undergoing hip surgery (and possibly more, depending on the timetable) is pretty devastating for the Vikings' hopes for 2010, since they'll likely be without a legit No. 1 wideout for most of the season. That's why it sure does seem logical for the Minnesota to inquire about picking up disgruntled wide receiver Vincent Jackson from the San Diego Chargers.

Jackson is currently holding out from Chargers camp and seems likely to bail on the season in San Diego -- so much so that the Chargers gave the Seattle Seahawks permission to chat   with Jackson and his agent about a contract in order to make a trade.

It's believed that the Bolts want a second-rounder for Jackson, and that price, given the Vikings need at wide receiver, is just about right for Minny.

Currently, the Vikings are staring down an ugly situation whereby their wide receiver depth chart reads as follows: Bernard Berrian, Percy Harvin, Greg Lewis, Javon Walker. Dearth of talent aside, this is problematic for a few reasons.

First, Berrian is much, much better suited as a deep threat than a true No. 1. Secondly, Harvin's talents are ideally utilized in the slot position, where the Vikes can move him all over the field. Third, Lewis and Walker aren't guys you want being forced into semi-major roles, much less starting gigs, should another injury occur.

The possibility of dealing for Jackson isn't without its cons, though: One issue facing a possible deal is that the Vikings would almost certainly have to ink Jackson to a long-term deal. That's expensive, obviously, and they just opened up their wallet to guarantee that Brett Favre would return for 2010 (although, really, they should just demand he take a pay cut).

Also, Jackson will miss the first three games of the season due to an NFL-imposed suspension, which severely saps his value when talking both trade and contract.

So maybe management doesn't make it rain on a guy who'll be locked in as a Viking for a long time AND miss some of this season because of personal conduct issues, but at this point, with almost all of their chips firmly planted in the center of the "win now" table, why not?

They've got an uncapped year on their hands, and since they don't provide an inter-conference or inter-division threat to the Chargers, there's really no reason why they shouldn't be at least willing to discuss contract with another 2009 Pro Bowler to fill what is suddenly the biggest positional depth problem on a team that appears pretty desperate to throw everything at a Super Bowl run this year.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS Feed .
Posted on: August 24, 2010 9:58 am
Edited on: August 24, 2010 1:24 pm

Rice has hip surgery (UPDATED)

S. Rice could miss the first half of the season (Getty). Posted by Josh Katzowitz

Vikings WR Sidney Rice had hip surgery on Monday that could sideline him for the first half of this season. This comes courtesy of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune – staff writer Judd Zulgad confirmed on the radio this morning that Rice actually underwent the surgery – and I have a few thoughts about this issue.

1) It’s been a bad two weeks for the Minnesota receivers. Percy Harvin has been suffering from debilitating migraine headaches and now the Rice news. What was once considered one of the top WR corps in the NFL has been reduced to one legit starting receiver in Bernard Berrian.

Joe Webb, who probably could play WR, is still at QB, and that leaves Greg Lewis (eight catches in 13 games last year), Taye Biddle (who was playing in the UFL last season), Marko Mitchell (four catches in 10 games last year) and a few other guys whose names you haven’t heard. Oh, and Javon Walker, who still hasn’t signed officially but actually might have a chance to make the roster .

Why did Rice have the surgery now? As opposed to way earlier in the offseason?

He had a standout season last year, catching 83 passes for 1,312 yards and eight touchdowns, and he was a force in the playoffs. But he injured his hip in the NFC championship game, and according to the paper, he saw three hip specialists in the offseason, two of whom recommended surgery.

Rice declined to do so. Why? And how pissed is Minnesota right now?

3) Brett Favre might have to be a miracle worker this season to get the Vikings back to the NFC championship game.

UPDATE (12:24 p.m.): The Vikings have officially signed Walker .

Related Content: Will Brinson and Andy Benoit discuss Rice's injury and how it impacts the Vikings in Tuesday's CBSSports.com Football Podcast.

If you can't view the podcast, click here to download .
Or, make it easy on yourself and  Subscribe via iTunes .

Posted on: August 23, 2010 4:02 pm

Vikings close to signing Javon Walker

J. Walker and B. Favre shown here during happier times (Getty). Posted by Josh Katzowitz

The scenario Will told you about the other day – the Vikings possibly signing Brett Favre’s old buddy (but not really), WR Javon Walker – seems to be on the verge of occurring.

According to ESPN.com , the Vikings plan to sign Walker, an eight-year veteran who’s spent the past two seasons in Oakland. Or, more accurately, has spent the past two seasons disappearing in Oakland.

Walker had his best success – an 89-catch, 1,482-yard, 12-touchdown year that resulted in Walker’s only Pro Bowl berth – when he was catching passes from Favre in Green Bay during the 2004 season.

But the next year, he held out during training camp. A move that did not sit well with Favre.

"If Javon wants to know what the quarterback thinks, and I would think he might, I'd tell him he's going about this the wrong way,” Favre said at the time. “When his agent tells him not to worry about what his teammates think and all that stuff, I'd tell him I've been around a long time and that stuff will come back to haunt you."

Walker suffered a bad knee injury in Week 1, and the next season, he found himself in Denver. He had a good season there in 2006 (69 catches, 1,084 yards, eight TDs), but since then, Walker has been a shell of his former self, combining for 41 catches and one score in the past three seasons.

I imagine Walker – who said a few months ago he’d be willing to play for the veterans minimum salary – would welcome a chance to play with Favre again, considering he’s been a non-factor four of the past five years he’s played. Besides, six of Favre’s targets caught 25 passes or more from him last season.

Don’t expect Walker (shown at right during happier times with Favre) to hang around too long, though. Right now, the Vikings receiving room is pretty bare without Percy Harvin (migraines) and Sidney Rice (hip). Assuming they return, though, Favre most likely will be throwing to receivers with whom he actually gets along.

And Walker most likely will have to contemplate retirement.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS Feed .

Posted on: August 23, 2010 8:37 am

Favre plays one series; result: Meh

B. Favre reacts after taking a sack from P. Willis on Sunday (AP). Posted by Josh Katzowitz

With all the talk about Brett Favre and Vikings coach Brad Childress – and how selfish Favre is and how much money he’s making and blah, blah, blah – we overlooked one thing Sunday night. How did he actually play in his first action of 2010?

Against the 49ers, Favre started and played one series and took four snaps. He hit Adrian Peterson on a swing pass for a 13-yard gain but then lost 10 yards when San Francisco LB Patrick Willis crushed him for a sack on a block missed by Peterson.

Here’s what Favre said after his brief appearance (via the Minneapolis Star Tribune ):
"I don’t know if we accomplished a whole lot," Favre said. "Like last year when I came in against Kansas City, I didn’t expect a whole lot. I really wanted to call plays in a game environment. I completed the first pass, a swing pass, which can be the hardest throw in football. Got hit a little bit, which I could have done without. Had to get it out of the way sometime."

Favre said he wishes he could have had another series.

"I would have liked to but I understand the situation," he said. "San Francisco is a very good football team. Probably the worst I felt all year physically overall was against these guys last year. We were fortunate to win on the last play. They’re a very physical active football team. Their scheme puts a lot of one-on-one blocking on our offensive line so I knew it would be that type of game. Really just kind of get in and get your feet wet."

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS Feed .

Posted on: August 22, 2010 11:23 pm
Edited on: August 22, 2010 11:31 pm

Is Favre just a built-up training camp holdout?

Serious apologies in advance for having to post something else on Brett Favre but, hey, he did return to the NFL today. Oh, yes, and he took four snaps, threw one pass and got tattooed by Patrick Willis. Link to that video below.

Anywho, NBC aired an interview with Favre and Al Michaels at halftime of Sunday's game and there were some interesting tidbits, including the fact that Favre was scared .

"In all honest, Al, there was a big part of me, there was some fear -- a fear of failure," Favre said.

Michaels then asked him why it takes him "so long" to make him his mind.

True that, Brett. True that. But he's still not really answering the question, unless he's actually admitting that he was always coming back and he's just skipping training camp. Which, um, actually makes sense. Perhaps even more interesting was his response to Michaels' question about the Vikings re-doing Favre's contract.

"They re-did your contract," Michaels began. "Some people would say, 'You know what he was doing, he was looking for a better deal.'"

"I knew that would be some people's assumption," Favre said. "It was tempting. But I've always made a lot of money. I knew I didn't need it."

Pause for a second on the fact that, no, that conversation doesn't make any sense in terms of flow. Michaels followed up by asking, "Did it move you any closer?"

"Honestly, no," Favre said. "It all came back to being obligated to the guys and that was really the strongest pull. I'm no fool -- it's a lot of money. But that in itself was not the biggest factor."

So, yeah, the quick reaction to this conversation is that a) Favre hates training camp and b) Favre loves money. That's totally cool. In fact, I bet 99% of NFL players feel that way, if not higher. Most of them just don't disguise those feelings through the annoying guise of retirement indecision. Although, my goodness, if that's the case, he's pulling off the most impressively disguised training camp holdout of all-time.

Seriously, think about it: if money was a huge issue in him coming back to Minnesota, he basically just refused to come to training camp until he got a new contract. WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT DARRELLE REVIS IS DOING. And, of course, anyone else that wants to get paid.

Yet we don't look at it that way, because we're so convinced that Favre actually wants the attention that his daily re/de-tirement provides. Perhaps thinking that way is giving him too much credit for his ability to manipulate everyone involved with the situation, but if that's the case, well, bravo, Brett. Bravo.

Oh yeah, Michaels then asked Favre what he thought about constantly being "lampooned."

"If I'm gonna play, I better play like I did last year," Favre said. "If you don't execute on a consistent basis, they're gonna throw daggers at you."

Or they'll just hope that Patrick Willis does stuff like he did to the Vikings' quarterback  during Favre's first series back. Ah, good times .

Follow us on Twitter (@CBSSportsNFL) and we'll make sure to give you any choice quotes from his press conference.
The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com