TIGER WOODS LOYAL FANS ONLY POST

Views:      
 
 
-

TIGER WOODS LOYAL FANS ONLY POST

April 14, 2013 1:18 am

I can just "imagine" it now...

TW thought to himself, "I'm supposed to drop here but dropping 2 yards farther back will give me the advantage I need so I'm going to do that even though it should result in a 2 shot penalty".
Jayhawk77
SinceNov 13, 2007
-

TIGER WOODS LOYAL FANS ONLY POST

April 14, 2013 2:35 am

Wrong Jay.  He admitted to the golfing world that he did it intentionaly.  He simply figured that no one would dispute the great Tiger Woods and that he would also the self-appointed rules official JayHawk77 to defend him.
kinik
SinceSep 13, 2006
-

TIGER WOODS LOYAL FANS ONLY POST

April 14, 2013 7:53 am

Jay,

I too am amazed that professional golfers, with their vast experience and knowledge of the rules, Tiger included, can find themselves in such a situation. Obviously, calling an official is the best option in a questionable situation.

What an unfortunate break...to hit the stick and have the ball zoom away!

Perhaps, he will get a hole in one to compensate his loss. I recall one amazing shot he hit some time back, chipping the cup edge on the way into the hole, with an iron shot.

Tim
Tim Sng
SinceJan 18, 2008
-

TIGER WOODS LOYAL FANS ONLY POST

April 14, 2013 8:06 am

CBS Quote "Rule 33-7/4.5  is supposed to keep unnecessary disqualifications from coming around. Under the description of Rule 33-7/4.5 there's a "not reasonably have known" factor that applies.

"However, if the Committee is satisfied that the competitor could not reasonably have known or discovered the facts resulting in his breach of the Rules, it would be justified under Rule 33-7 in waiving the disqualification penalty prescribed by Rule 6-6d," the rulebook reads. "The penalty stroke(s) associated with the breach would, however, be applied to the hole where the breach occurred."

“For some time we have been concerned that, in certain limited circumstances, disproportionate disqualification penalties have been required by the Rules,"Peter Dawson, chief executive of The R&A said in April 2011. “This carefully considered decision reflects our desire to ensure that the Rules of Golf remain fair and relevant in the changing environment in which the game is played today.”

The entire purpose of the rule amendment was to keep the new-age technology that can quickly allow folks at the course or folks watching not to flip the script by calling in to the PGA and busting players for something they unwillingly did."

Tiger rules!!

 

Tim Sng
SinceJan 18, 2008
-

TIGER WOODS LOYAL FANS ONLY POST

April 14, 2013 10:17 am

Tiger rules!!

Or Rules for Tiger.

 Better get used to seeing this Timmy .....   

 

*

nokoman56
SinceSep 9, 2008
-

TIGER WOODS LOYAL FANS ONLY POST

April 14, 2013 10:54 am

Tim the "not reasonably have known" factor does not apply.  Tiger did know the rule.  He had 3 options and he himself chose to rehit from the last spot.  How could he make a choice of 3 if he did not know the options.  He cheated--he confessed. 
kinik
SinceSep 13, 2006
-

TIGER WOODS LOYAL FANS ONLY POST

April 14, 2013 9:29 pm

On this, Noko n Kinik, I have to agree with you both. See my new post. Tim
Tim Sng
SinceJan 18, 2008