Where are all the QUALIFIED black HCs?

Any honest, educated person knows we MUST cut spending on so-called entitlement programs. This President doesn't want to hear any of it


The president is open to cutting entitlement programs that don't work and adjsuting programs what aren't functioning properly but he also understands that a lot these programs are necessary for our country.  The right never seems interested in keeping any programs that help the poor.

He told young black men to "pull your pants up". Want their answer? "F#*K You, Obama". Don't believe me? Go to the 'hood and take a survey.


Most of the "hood" people who are upset with Obama it's because they expected him to be focused on black issues instead of issues that affect the entire country.  While I can understand why they would feel that way I for one am glad he's more concerned with the entire country rather than the guetto. 


In his "You Didn't Build It" speech (which was an insult to any business owner),


the right loves to act like he was telling business owners they are not resposible for their own success.  That's not even close to what he was saying.  He was saying that they didn't build the infrastructure that allowed them to find success, it was already built for them.  He was saying that along the lines someone helped you get to where you are, you didn't do it alone so you shouldn't think that other people shouldn't get help.  The right tends to think everyone has to go it alone but the left believs that we are all in this together. 

"The rich" as you call them or the top 1% pays around 38% of the taxes in this country.   The bottom 50% pays around 3% of total income tax.
How is this catering to them?


And you think that's the tax rates that Republicans want? Some of the right are smart enough to know that we need a sliding scale but I've seen Republicans argue that everyone should be taxed at 15%.  So people making less than $8000, who are surely already not making it finanacially, would see their taxes raised while people who can afford to give more will see their's lowered significantly.  If you want to lower the corporate tax rate, I can listen to that argument but I think a person's personal income tax should be at a high rate if you make a lot of money.  I'm not going to feel sorry for a millionaire having a few extra percent taken from him when he's still going to be a millionaire.  But back to the question, do I think it's catering to them, I think that Bush's tax cuts overwelmingly helped the rich.  Overall they hurt the country because we didn't have the money to pay for everything he was spending money on which is where the faulty math comes in.  Obama insisted on raising the tax rates on the well to do by a few percent, back to Clinton era rates, and the the republicans faught him tooth and nail.  So, yes, they do cater to the rich. 

There are certain issues where it doesn't matter if it's legal in one state and not another.  But the institution of marriage shouldn't be one of them.  It makes no sense that a gay couple can be married in Connecticut but if they move to Florida for what ever reason their marriage won't be recognized.  We may be seperate states but we are one country after all. 


It doesn't make sense to someone on the left, b/c that's one of their values they want to force everyone else to endorse.  Which is what they want SCOTUS judges to do, which is why it's so important to them, even not ruling based on the Constitution which is what their actual job is supposed to be.  At the same time, they'd be for a state not recognizing another state's concealed carry permit even though the 2nd amendment is in the Constitution.


Obviously you haven't taken the time to look into it.  Replublicans all over the country introduced laws to limit certain people's voting rights.  You can do your own legwork on it if you are really interested in the truth.  As I said about Florida's voter registration laws the Reps tried to pass it's just too much info for me to try to look up and post here.  I guess though it's in the wording.  They aren't denying eligible voters the right to vote, they are trying to change what makes a person eligible because they know the more people there are voting, the less of a chance they have of winning elections.  Needless to say the people who tend to be affected by the laws they introduce are Democrats or lean that way. 


Oh I've looked I've kept up on the news.  Again, I've seen nothing to supress voting, but rather supress voter fraud.  You want to make the claim otherwise, provide it.


You keep asking the same question about Dems getting people IDs but don't seem to want to accept the answer.  You can't get an ID without a birth certificate.  If no birth certificate exists then you can't get one, now can you?  I lost my birth certificate, actually I think my ex-girlfriend stole it, but all i had to do was go online to the state of Michigan and order a new one.  If no birth certificate exists then how do you get one?  There are a lot of older black people who were never issued birth certificates.  Any younger Americans, no matter the color, should easily be able to get a copy of it but a lot of older people, just can't get one and the majority of those people were black, particularly black southerners. 


You're the one not accepting the reality that your Dems could care less about the poor.  Legislators have to power to help those people get their ids.  They likely have some kind of paper trail, whether it's Bills in their names, etc.  They can get them ids and waiver the fees based on income.  They just don't care about them except to the extent that they can exploit their situation to protect the voter fraud that benefits the Dems.  Just like the Dems will use public buses to get poor voters to the polls, but they won't use those same buses to evacuate them from a hurricane.


OK, if you say so.  Now we're going back to the Democratic Party of the mid 19th century.  Like I've said, we see the Republican Party as the party of hate and fear.  I personally can't see why anyone would try to say the opposite. 


Um, b/c the Democrats run on the fake race card and fake war on women, while Republicans were running on the handling on the economy and the debt which will be over 20 trillion when Obama leaves office.


I can't say how your city is set up but here I can't think of one single abortion clinic in the black part of town.  I can think of about 4 of them in the white part of town. 


Do you actually want to deny that abortion clinics are put in minority neighborhoods?  The point is when an abortion clinic is put in a minority neighborhood, it's purpose is to target and kill minorities.


What's false and silly about it?  Are you trying to argue that the Republicans don't cater to the rich?   


They don't preach punishing success, nor do they demonize job providing profit.  Do you think the Democrats don't cater to the rich?  Big companies have the resources to overcome mass regulation that smaller companies don't.  Obamacare hurts smaller companies far more than any impact to the larger companies who will just pass the costs on to us. 

The problem is not taxes , its the government spending, pure and simple. what the dems or any politican doesnt tell you is that we can not tax our way outta this mess. i know obama and others want to think they can but they can not! the problem i have with higher taxes is it just feeds the beast! it does nothing to cut spending or bring down our debt! but i think the people should keep more of what they make and tax over time at a lower rate instead of a higher rate, let the people that put in more then 40 hrs a week keep more of that income they make for working over those said 40 hrs. there are simple soultions out there, but common sense is a think of the past in politics and the blind sheep that follow those politicans

You're either blind, brainwashed or both.  Again, voter fraud hardly happens so to suggest the left is trying to protect something that will likely never win them an election is just ridiculous.  The laws that the right introduces disenfranchises voters by the thousands.  It absolutely helps them win elections.  George Bush would have never won Florida in 2000 had the states' Republicans not pushed through voter suppression laws.  The right simply tries to disguise suppression as voter fraud to push through their disenfranchising laws.  It's sad that you can't see that.


Nope, you're just wrong on this one and you come across as a pretty blind conformist to the Dems, so you're one to talk.  Regardless, this topic has become redundant, so I'll agree to disagree.


No, again, what I'm saying is people vote for candidates that stump on issues that affect them. 


Those aren't race based (despite how some are fooled into perceiving them as such) issues though, so you aren't supporting that point.


And who's to say that any random white guy with the exact same record as Lewis wouldn't still be employed?  You guys have been arguing this whole time that race has nothing to do with anything so why does Lewis' employment have to do with his race?


Well I can't think of a white coach that's been able to keep their job with the same lack of success Lewis has had, but that isn't the point (and we aren't the one's playing the race card on this).  The point is that the 2 coaches that seem to have the most job security despite what happens are black which should also be recognized in this discussion.  Lewis for reasons unexplained.  Tomlin b/c the Steelers tend to hold onto their coaches for a long time.  The Steelers regressed pretty bad this year as the many players leftover from the Bill Cowher era are aging.  The Steelers seem to commit to their a long time, which will likely save Tomlin from receiving the Brian Billick treatment if the regression continues and becomes a trend.  

and i think obama care will hurt everyone, does anyone really trust the government to run any program well? i mean really? look at s.s and medicare and medicad, there all a mess and now we think they will run healthcare well? man the crack that some people must be smoking! 

 In his "You Didn't Build It" speech (which was an insult to any business owner)

=====================   

There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody. ... You moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for; you hired workers the rest of us paid to educate; you were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn't have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory, and hire someone to protect against this, because of the work the rest of us did. Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea. God bless. Keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is, you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.

Elizabeth Warren (D) Massachusetts

To claim that statement insults business owners,is an insult to the intelligence of every American taxpayer with no tax shelter,offshore bank and obscure write offs.This country was built by it's citizens,and funded by wealthy businessman who are dead and gone,the problem is their offspring who feel entitled and privileged to run amok(all the greedy minded behind the bank and housing scheme were born in the 70's..the 70's!,and with blessings from those older who knew it was a bad idea as they pulled the cord on their gold parachutes)and yet they're still flush with daddys hard earned riches.The time has come to gag on that silver spoon junior...and the beautiful twist is it all comes courtesy of a man who was elected not once but twice...look at it this way,the majority of Americans will never see the kind of wealth the 1% inherited from hard working fathers and grand fathers.But back those Americans into a corner and they will storm the nations wealthy communities with guns...whoops...i mean torches,tar and feathers...that is the reason the wealthy are the loudest voices against banning weapons that can kill 30 people in 20 seconds.
There is nothing to fear but fear itself,having to pay more taxes is a scary proposition when the end result benefits the majority.The best investment a millionaire can make going forward is property in crime ridden neighborhoods..W set the urgent construction of Public Housing on fast forward before leaving office,and besides,what better way to familiarize yourself with your enemy than seeing how they struggle to live day to day.  

so stan , u really think the government should take half of someones estate when they pass? thats insane man! i do agree with the offspring of the rich comment you made, but there is a difference with that, they support thereselfs and are not on the government dime. my grand parents worked their asses off so my mom and her children would have a better life, they made alot of money and now we are not rich but not poor either, i work for what i have as well and i will be damned if i want the government taking a damn dime of that money! not just to go blow it or pass it on to their rich freinds like they ALL do! and i sure dont want it going to people that are just to damn lazt to go out and work for a living!

Um, b/c the Democrats run on the fake race card and fake war on women, while Republicans were running on the handling on the economy and the debt which will be over 20 trillion when Obama leaves office.

===================

Have they identified the Romney impersonator? you know that guy!, the guy who had the balls of an out of touch idiot to claim 47% of Americans don't pay taxes.The mass influx of Hispanics into the U.S. came via Ron Reagan and his sweeping deregulation of unions and cuts to border security,thats very real.
Name a few Republican backed program that benefit the well being of American women,Democrats always champion the plight of American women be it equal pay or the right to choose,and thats very real.
How much of your fabricated number $20 Trillion is W responsible for?come on now,don't have me copy/paste the embarrassing facts,come clean with facts...here is one...he blatantly lined the pockets of the wealthy during his 8 years,here is another,can we agree that a war costs money? how about 2 wars at the same time?
Okay i'll give you another,there were more people unemployed the day after W left office than the 1st day he took office.
Whats life like in that glass house?      

so stan , u really think the government should take half of someones estate when they pass?

===================

No,but any CPA worth his weight will show you every tax has a loophole,and the Obama Estate Tax is written so nothing is taken,it is taxed.It's not the 40 acre ranch becomes 20 in a day,or the trust fund is all there in the morning,and slashed in half at the end of that days business.If you are wealthy in America now is not the time to panic,the tax revenue generated,and who,what and where that benefits goes as Obama has planned and intended,that means it did what it was supposed to do...it becomes popular with the majority of working Americans,and may even be considered again albeit much smaller...if that happens?...the wise wealthy will have already taken measures to offset that real possibility.Keep in mind,the original number was more than $250 thousand a year,thats the number the Democrats calculated and may go back to.The Republicans demanded,not suggested their number...so much for bipartisanship and compromise,the right is so full of crap most wear cowboy boots.  

and the unemployment rate now as the day obama took office, wow what a great job he did. why do people always need to do this repub vs dem thing? they are both failing the people badly. its funny that obama people are always so fat to point out bush, as if bush is a good person to point to or there lipnest test for president! bush sucked and this guy is no better! but if blaming bush or saying obama is better then bush, well thats like being the richest man in the welfare line!!

and the unemployment rate now as the day obama took office, wow what a great job he did. why do people always need to do this repub vs dem thing? they are both failing the people badly. its funny that obama people are always so fat to point out bush, as if bush is a good person to point to or there lipnest test for president! bush sucked and this guy is no better! but if blaming bush or saying obama is better then bush, well thats like being the richest man in the welfare line!!

=================

Placing blame on someone who had no control of a situation is different than placing it on someone who personally picked cabinet members to help him govern the United States of America. 
W and his administration were solely responsible for the unemployment rate the 1st 28 months of Obamas 1st term.
W did more damage on domestic issues,the economy of his country and the world,not to mention his assinine international policies,than any U.S. President before him...and his dad condoned training Bin Laden in Langley,VA. as director of the CIA,and immediately invested in foreign oil companies when he became the 41st president of the U.S. .W may go down as the worst president in American history.

During the 8 W years
Ask the people of Louisiana what they think of W
The Patriot Act is a money pit
The Iraq War
Blowing the cover of a CIA opperative
Unauthorized NSA surveillance 
Violations of the Geneva Convention and Abu Ghraib
Gauntanamo Bay became a place to torture not a prison
North Korea enriched Uranium and tested missiles regularly
Alienated Serbia when he befriended Kosovo

I could go on but i'll leave it here,the election making him the 43rd U.S. President was contested on voting tabulation mistakes in Florida,the controversy was litigated in Florida,all the while his brother was the Govenor of Florida.
Americans elected Gore president,the Electoral College awarded Bush the presidency.          

Ask the people of l.a. what they think of there local and state leaders, thats who is really to blame for katrina
agree the patriot is bogus
iraq war was also a waste
gaunto bay is still open bro!
north korea hasnt stopped under obama either
again, i dont see alot of change with obama, i agree bush sucked , i have stated this already but obama is no better in my opinion! we can agree to disagree but thatnks for the cival and respectfull debate

How much of your fabricated number $20 Trillion is W responsible for?come on now,don't have me copy/paste the embarrassing facts,come clean with facts...here is one...he blatantly lined the pockets of the wealthy during his 8 years,here is another,can we agree that a war costs money? how about 2 wars at the same time?

Bush did cause a lot of the debt. However Obama in on track to triple what Bush did in 8 years. That is a face. He has added more publicly held debt than any previous president.

   Okay i'll give you another,there were more people unemployed the day after W left office than the 1st day he took office.


and under Obama it rose all the way to 10%, now its gone back down to 7.8 where Bush left it.  Way to make a difference!  

Republicans all over the country introduced laws to limit certain people's voting rights. If no birth certificate exists then how do you get one?  There are a lot of older black people who were never issued birth certificates.

“Limit certain people’s voting rights”???  Name one of those Laws?  The Laws which they are proposing , is to make certain you are the person, you say you are.  IT’S NO BIG DEAL!  I didn’t see anyone complaining, when the government told people to get a Photo-ID for their Food Stamp Card.  And that is not a racial comment, because more white are on welfare than blacks.

Like I've said, we see the Republican Party as the party of hate and fear.

You see the GOP that way; that’s the problem. You never look at the morons in your own party, with their hate and fear-mongering (Chris Matthews, Barbara Streisand, Whoopi Goldberg, Maxine Waters, etc.).  Type Charles Barron into your search engine!  This is a New York City Democratic Councilman, who makes Russ Limbaugh or Donald Trump, look like choir-boys, when it comes to hate.  How about Dems always saying, Biden didn’t mean it, when he said “their gonna put you’all back in chains”?  Wanna know how many blacks in the ‘hood believe it?  Trust me on this: A Lot! That’s not fear?

George Bush would have never won Florida in 2000 had the states' Republicans not pushed through voter suppression laws.

Oh, Yeah!  Who was the person, who designed those ballots, which caused all the confusion?  Are you ready for this? Are you sure?  It was a woman from the Florida Democratic Party.  Case Closed!

8 years later the deficit was a surplus so I just really can't believe that we all knew the country was in deep financially all the way back in 1992.  The internet and housing booms of the 90s had most people feeling pretty secure.

Those figures about the “surplus” were misleading. Even the CATO Institute jumped all over that. The U.S. Government Accounting Office, even admitted it. But, you’re right; Clinton was doing a great job with the economy. Until we found out that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, were backing loans, which many people couldn’t afford the mortgage payments. This sent the housing market into a free-fall. Clinton was a champion of Mac and Mae.

Yes, you are supposed to have your ID on you at all times.  Unfortunately not everyone is eligible to have one.  Therein lies the problem with having to have one to vote.

Your own statement, answers the question!  If a person isn’t ELIGIBLE, then they shouldn’t be allow to vote.

Romney would have taken it in a far worse direction, basically the direction that got us into this mess in the first place. 

You don’t know that!  We do know that Romney has been a problem-solver most of his life.  Our Olympic Program was in deep trouble, until he took over and stop the bleeding. We do know that Massachusetts was one of the States ranked at the bottom in job creation, before he took over. After he left, they were 29^th.  Now, to my favorite: BAIN-CAPITAL! And as far as I’m concern, this is where he could’ve won the election!  I know what people are saying, “I’m crazy”.  Let’s make believe during one of the debates, the topic of out-sourcing of jobs comes up. Romney should’ve said this:

Fine, Mr. President (or Mr./Mrs. Moderator), let’s talk about my time at Bain and the out-sourcing of jobs. But please, please give me a lot and I mean a lot of time, to talk about how many thousands and thousands of jobs, Bain Investment Companies created right here in America.  And I don’t mean just in rich and middle-class areas. Let’s talk about the jobs we created in low-income areas, like in Philadelphia, Los Angeles, East New York, Detroit and even in the president’s home city of Chicago.  Want more proof?  Go to Newark, New Jersey and ask Mayor Corey Booker, what Bain-Capital Companies did for his city.  Seven or Eight years ago, most companies were running away from Newark, But our firms went and help create jobs. Mayor Booker was talking about this a few months ago, but someone in his party, told him to button-up.

This is what I would’ve told Romney to say, if I were one of his campaign advisers. Don’t run away from your past at Bain, run to it!  This is the same strategy many Offensive Coordinators use, when going up against a great defensive player….run at him. By the way, when Romney did leave Bain, that’s when the in-fighting at the firm started. Mr. Bain had to ask Romney to come back and help calm things down.  That’s why they call him a “solver”.

The president is open to cutting entitlement programs that don't work and adjsuting programs what aren't functioning properly but he also understands that a lot these programs are necessary for our country.  The right never seems interested in keeping any programs that help the poor.

We have not seen any proof of this, yet.  By the way, how many more programs can we give the poor?  Look at those “special” Social Security Programs:  Messed-up your life with drugs or crime? No Problem! Welcome aboard, even if you didn’t pay hardly anything into the system.

Most of the "hood" people who are upset with Obama it's because they expected him to be focused on black issues instead of issues that affect the entire country.

Have you ever live in the ‘hood?  I live in it, most of my life.  Two-Thirds of the people in the ‘hood, are not focus on important issues with their lives. Once again, trust me on that!

The right tends to think everyone has to go it alone but the left believes that we are all in this together. 

Once again, this is a totally false statement!  Paul Ryan’s Father used a government grant, to help him start his business. Many people have!  Even when I was a Democrat, debating Republicans, I’ve never heard a GOP say something like that. Stop making-up things!  You sound like that garbage on MSNBC.

How much of your fabricated number $20 Trillion is W responsible for?come on now,don't have me copy/paste the embarrassing facts,come clean with facts...here is one...he blatantly lined the pockets of the wealthy during his 8 years,here is another,can we agree that a war costs money? how about 2 wars at the same time?
Okay i'll give you another,there were more people unemployed the day after W left office than the 1st day he took office.

It’s not $20 Trillion (not yet)!  It’s about $17 Trillion!  And yes, I agree with you, 100% about “W” adding to the deficit. And yes, Bush/Cheney was in bed with Halliburton and other corporations.  The same way Obama was in bed with Solyndra.  Oh, I’m Sorry!  Please don’t run away!  You can’t get ONE, freaking Democratic to talk about  how the Obama Administration,  gave Solyndra the money without the Energy Board approval and how the money disappeared.

Bush did cause a lot of the debt. However Obama in on track to triple what Bush did in 8 years. That is a face. He has added more publicly held debt than any previous president.

=======================

Using the term on track infers a projection,projections are predictions,and predictions are closer to gambling than facts...but i digress. 

The Sub Prime Crisis timeline between 2000 and 2008 is pretty compelling evidence that under the Bush Administration and with Alan Greenspan heading the Federal Reserve, the U.S. banking system,tax codes and the national economy took a radical turn toward an unthinkable depression.The 1st term for Obama was doomed before it began,when the leader of the free world has to resort to a quasi Marxist theory in order to just project any semblance of economic stability the problem was enormous and still is. 
Under Obama’s watch, debt held by the public had increased by about $4.5 trillion, or roughly 72 percent. Total debt had increased by nearly $5 trillion, or about 47 percent.By either form of debt, the amounts added during Obama’s administration were not greater than the levels on the day he took office.
Here are some facts...
Presidents Bush and Obama have contributed to the debt increases over the last decade. Those factors include tax cuts enacted under Bush and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, both of which were started by the Bush administration, as well as the stimulus bill and another tax cut deal approved by Obama.And a weak economy contributes mightily to higher debt,consider the reduction in federal revenues and greater spending on unemployment benefits.
The Obama presidency has 4 more years,we can revisit his rising and falling unemployment rates in 2016.
   

You can’t get ONE, freaking Democratic to talk about  how the Obama Administration,  gave Solyndra the money without the Energy Board approval and how the money disappeared.

==================

I'm an Independant that will talk about the Solyndra fiasco,Solar Energy companies were being touted as the next big U.S. job creator until China caught wind of it.During the Bush administration they were also tempted by the possibility of homegrown job creation,but they balked at Solyndra rejecting a loan feeling the company was unstable.The Obama administration has been accused of rejecting the House and Energy Comissions warning that Solyndra was a bad investment.The Obama administration has also been accused of pressuring the Energy Department for approval as they had already planned an Obama photo op at the ground breaking of the Solyndra site.
As it stands,Solyndra can be sued by the Energy Department to repay the $535 Million loan,but pigs would have to fly at the same time hell freezes over for that to happen.So as usual the U.S. taxpayer is left holding the bag,maybe we can fit it into the Bank Bailout bag...like when you empty the bathroom trash, and consolidate it with the kitchen trash, so it fits easier in the garbage can.   

Have they identified the Romney impersonator? you know that guy!, the guy who had the balls of an out of touch idiot to claim 47% of Americans don't pay taxes.The mass influx of Hispanics into the U.S. came via Ron Reagan and his sweeping deregulation of unions and cuts to border security,thats very real.


Sure, have they identified the 7 extra states Obama talked about.  That 47% was probably federal income tax or something.  You know the ones the president was talking about when he was saying he only wanted to raise raxes on the rich b/c the middle class was hurting and then allowed the entire middle class to have less $$ in their paychecks this month when their social security tax went up.

How about that the Dems tried to pretend that revenues decreased after the Bush tax cuts, even though revenues in increased while the rich took on a larger % of the tax burden?  Why were they so againts revenues increasing and the rich paying a larger % of the pie just b/c the rich go to pay a lower %?

Oh Unions are concerned about the influx of undocumented workers now? lol


Name a few Republican backed program that benefit the well being of American women,Democrats always champion the plight of American women be it equal pay or the right to choose,and thats very real.


The Tax Cuts, duh.  Working women benefit from keeping more of their own $$ also.  Also, the unborn victims of violence act which adds protections for women who choose to have their children.  Democrats opposed this because they were more worried about protecting abortion than women in favor of pro-abortion groups who falsely call themselves "pro-choice" groups.  They also kill more minorities a year then all the white power groups combined.   


Just b/c the Republicans don't march lock step with the Democrats doesn't mean they are against equal pay for equal work.  The democrats won't even define what the specifics are for equal work.  Just the same vague statement acting like they need to Car Max the system.  Laws like that can hurt women when they work hard and can negotiate a higher salary too.  What are they supposed to do, create a list of every position out there and then say that every CEO (or whatever) can only make this one flat rate in the sense of "fairness"?  The way the Democrats come across is like saying since Luol Deng is a small forward and avgs more than LeBron James then Deng should be paid more.  When a group makes a claim like that though, and then doesn't include the specifics, it usually means


How much of your fabricated number $20 Trillion is W responsible for?come on now,don't have me copy/paste the embarrassing facts,come clean with facts...here is one...he blatantly lined the pockets of the wealthy during his 8 years,here is another,can we agree that a war costs money? how about 2 wars at the same time?


It's called an estimate.  A conservative one at that.  Considering that Obama shows no interest at all in reducing the debt and if he were to accumulate the same amount of debt he did his first term, the debt will be over 22 trillion.  Go ahead and copy and paste away.  I can copy and paste too.


Revenues increased, while the % the rich paid in increased.  Who cares if they got more $$ out of it.  You don't think Obama throws some cash the way of his friends ("cough" Solyndra "cough")? 


Sure wars cost $$, but they aren't supposed to be permanent.  I haven't seen the Dems talk about where as the spending decreases that they'll use it to reduce the debt, but rather find other places to spend it. BTW, do you think the reasons for the Afghan war were unjust?  Should Osama Bin Laden just been allowed to create terrorist acts to kill Americans w/o any repercussions?  Also, the Dems voted to go to Iraq also.  If you're going to claim that it was b/c Bush lied.  Go ahead and prove it, instead of being a blind sheep to the Dems telling you he did, in order to not be held responsible for their vote.


Okay i'll give you another,there were more people unemployed the day after W left office than the 1st day he took office.
Whats life like in that glass house?      

 
BLS's numbers only go back to 2,002.  Wouldn't surprise me if they were lower.  We're talking just having an internet boom vs having housing bad housing loans finally catch up to us.  What did the Dems do to stop those bad housing loans to people with bad credit?  Now that unemployment rate remains relatively the same while the participation rate has dropped from 65.2 to 63.6.  You're one to talk about glass houses - lol

What a joke that democrats champion women. They had the chance to give Hiliary Clinton the white house but they chose to go with a guy who had the least experience in history as their nominee. After Benghazi democrats tossed out her as a sacrificial lamb as they did Susan Rice.

Liberals are hilarious with defending Obama's you didn't build that remarks but torching Romney for his one line of a speech. His whole speech to his friends were that 47% of the country has already made up their mind to vote for Obama then gave examples. Was it completely factual true, not completely but Obama's debate on how the military does not use bayonet's anymore was factually wrong as well.

Obama doesn't care about black people, white people, latino's or any specific group just which ever is giving him the most money and attention at the time. He cares about whoever likes him in the moment. How many of his black pals has he sold out, how many white pals has he sold out, how many women in power he appointed has he sold out. He only cares about himself and his legacy.

That 47% was probably federal income tax or something. 

==================

Probably,or something...surely it wasn't the height of arrogance feeling he was surrounded by others with similar beliefs.


You know the ones the president was talking about when he was saying he
only wanted to raise raxes on the rich b/c the middle class was hurting
and then allowed the entire middle class to have less $$ in their
paychecks this month when their social security tax went up.

==================

What tax bracket would this Midddle Class you seem to champion be in?

Oh Unions are concerned about the influx of undocumented workers now? lol

================

By having a concomitant effect on wages,Reagan broke the backs of unions,and if there was ever a time to make a run for the border that was the signal,and they've been coming in droves ever since.

The Tax Cuts, duh.  Working women benefit from keeping more of their own
$$ also.  Also, the unborn victims of violence act which adds
protections for women who choose to have their children.  Democrats
opposed this because they were more worried about protecting abortion
than women in favor of pro-abortion groups who falsely call themselves
"pro-choice" groups.  They also kill more minorities a year then all the
white power groups combined. 

=================

Why do the majority of working American women vote Democrat?

White power groups killing minorities?


  It's called an estimate.  A conservative one at that.  Considering that
Obama shows no interest at all in reducing the debt and if he were to
accumulate the same amount of debt he did his first term, the debt will
be over 22 trillion.  Go ahead and copy and paste away.  I can copy and
paste too.       

===================

That dog won't hunt... The first $1 trillion deficit was under George W. Bush, and he was the one who built up the spending side and reduced the revenue side to create our current annual deficits.


Sure wars cost $$, but they aren't supposed to be permanent.  I haven't
seen the Dems talk about where as the spending decreases that they'll
use it to reduce the debt, but rather find other places to spend it.
BTW, do you think the reasons for the Afghan war were unjust?  Should
Osama Bin Laden just been allowed to create terrorist acts to kill
Americans w/o any repercussions?  Also, the Dems voted to go to Iraq
also.  If you're going to claim that it was b/c Bush lied.  Go ahead and
prove it, instead of being a blind sheep to the Dems telling you he
did, in order to not be held responsible for their vote.

=============================

And today American soldiers patrol the streets of cities in countries Republicans brand as "Terrorist Havens" in order to fund American defense contractors with Republican stock holders.Cheney hatched the plot to invade Afghanistan,and that makes sense considering his Haliburton connection and the oil platforms they build in the Caspian Sea.The Afghan invasion was more about installing surveillance towers to watch China and Russia...lets not kid ourselves.After being discovered by American military advisors observing Afghani Freedom Fighters hold their own during the Russian invasion of Afghanistan,one leader stood out as being genuinely concerned for the well being of his country and people,his name was Osama Bin Laden,and he learned the art of terrorism right here in the good old USA...GH Bush was directing the CIA at the time and gladly signed off on it.The training of Bin Laden was to have him lead the entire effort to beat back the Russians and they did.Bin Laden was told in return for his victory the US would aid and help rebuild his war torn country.When the US reneged on that promise he vowed revenge...and that happened on September 11th 2001,an act he would pay for with his life.I'm a registered Independant.

 What did the Dems do to stop those bad housing loans to people with bad credit? 

=========================

Squeeze out some toothpaste,now put it back in the tube...yeah,Democrats can't do it either