Well, while I may think your ideas are the product of a weak effete mind, I wouldn't go as far as calling you a "woman."
clearly not, for starters, that is two grades above your reading comprehension. Second, you are too stupid to see the greater point. For the sake of argument, lets say you are right? Which you aren't, but lets say you were. Then what? do you get some special badge you get to carry around? Do people outside your parent's storage shed congratulate you? You much rather be right in this message board, than have some basic skill that are needed to succeed in life. That is truly sad, again, if you weren't so stupid, you would be a tragedy.The only tragedy is the idea that started this thread. It would do nothing to reduce concussions, would ruin the game of football and would put players at risk when they attempted to cut water in order to meet the requirements.
It is a terrible character flaw.
So is butchering the English language every time you write a sentence.
The only tragedy is the idea that started this thread. It would do nothing to reduce concussions, would ruin the game of football and would put players at risk when they attempted to cut water in order to meet the requirements.
It's not a good idea, so just let this thread die and we'll pretend like it never happened.
This is just stupid. This would be like saying there should be a inch limit for male porno actors.
and that would affect you how?
clearly not, for starters,This is what I am talking about. You never fail to deliver.
For the sake of argument, lets say you are right?Oh, you're asking? O.K. Yes, I am right.
Which you aren't, but lets say you were.Is there a noun in our future?
You much rather be right in this message board, than have some basic skill that are needed to succeed in life.
and that would affect you how?
I would be out of work.
This is what I am talking about. You never fail to deliver.
For the sake of argument, lets say you are right?Oh, you're asking? O.K. Yes, I am right.
Which you aren't, but lets say you were.Is there a noun in our future?
You much rather be right in this message board, than have some basic skill that are needed to succeed in life.
Like English comprehension and basic writing skills? You clearly have cornered the market on those.
I can eat alphabet soup and piss better sentences than you can manage to construct.
All this, and you still can't refute the fact that you're "idea" that you credited to "the great" Mel Kiper is horribly short-sighted and can't stand up to five minutes of scrutiny.
It has been a pleasure exposing you as a complete moron. My work is done here.
So.....much.....Hostility....in....
.this....thread
But yeah, the idea of a weight limit is dumb. Makes no sense and won't solve the problem.
A better idea might be to have the players stop wearing equipment, just play in shorts and a jersey and why tackle? Just use flags. Problem solved.
And football is not a combat sport like MMA or boxing. It's a CONTACT sport. Big difference. Basketball is a contact sport too. Perhaps we should install weight limits there, though of course that would also instill height limits by association.
I will admit this, at least you are better at this, than Fresh Kill, Scuba, and PittSteel. Those guys are as funny as the burnt victim ward. There insults are so bad, kids with celebral palsy feel bad for them. But regarless, stating you are the best out of them, is like saying in the land of the blind, you have the best sense of smell. is a small, minor victory, but is a victory none the less.
-
Meh, I'll take that as the minor compliment it was intended as.
Now, to your comment. It seems you have a problem with women....I guess being rejected all those years, did a number of you. You know, if I were you, I would give them a try. They have some really awesome parts that guys don't. But if its guys that you are into, and there is nothing that would lead me to believe you are not. Hey, more power to you. Do your thing, but maybe you should think about stopping with the women bashing. It is a terrible character flaw.
-
Now you have entered ... The Clueless Zone. I find it ironic that after you chastise others for the weakness of their attacks, you would yourself engage in such predictable, lazy intimations that I have had troubles with women, based entirely on a few comments and knowing nothing of my history. 1st of all, as you are aware, I have no difficulty in metaphorically "tooting my own horn", and doing such I will inform you (your belief or non belief is immaterial to me) that I am pretty damn handsome. Long blond hair blue eyes and have been lifting weights since the 7th grade, so I never had ANY trouble with women, certainly not a rejection issue. My wife of 12 years could attest to that.
-
That said, I don't bash women, I bash idiots, regardless of their sex, I treat them equally, unlike you who seems to demonstrate your sexist attitudes with inferences that women need to be protected from bashing above and beyond such protections afforded men, obviously from the misogynist idea that they are weaker and need protecting. So I find it emminently ironic and laughable that in your rush to try to say I have a problem with women, you reveal your own inherent misogyny.
Let me see if I can string together a few words that are coherent enough for you.Well let's have a look.
You are another idiot, that comes from the long line of social rejects that hang around these boards.