It was annouced on thursday afternoon and today was my first post on the topic. Good job attempting to lie on me.
I'm not in rage. It's just funny how the only reason he said he would take Kobe over LBJ is due to rings. Where was his basketball reasons? Like Kobe does this better than Lebron or Kobe does that better than Lebron? Nowhere to be found.I aint bothering to read more, he doesn't need reasonings. Michael Jordan knows what he's talking about, rings are what matter as far the whole Robert Horry being better than MJ talk. Well 7 rings > 6 rings sure and Im sure MJ would like to have 7 rather than 6 but I'm also sure everyone in existence would rather be Jordan than Horry.
As I said, if you think anyone but Russell is the best ever, you're flat out a moron.
Russell owned the second best player in the league despite the size disadvantage. Brains, energy, skill.
The stats Wilt and Russell put up would not happen in today's eraNo, and the 60s era was a lot more fast paced, so stats were inflated. There were still a lot of good players back then. Wilt and Russel weren't the only good big men in that era.
jordan is 50.
you can get a fat, out of shape bum in the street (like most of the faker fans who dwell in this board) and he can say he banged 6 girls in the old days.
just because the new blood like lebron is challenging his mantle doesn't mean jordan has the authority to refute that possibility. he should take his geriatric vitamins and shut up.