Global Warming is a Myth

Furor stultorum magister. 
-
In pace requiescat 


Gooney Goo Goo



Nib Sugaroth Baheim

Molon Labe, bitches.

Do you think I listen to nothing but Cannibal Corpse or something? 

Im gonna assume thats a heavy metal band.  And yes.  hahaha

I think you'd be surprised at some of the laid back music I listen to. 

Well Ive never seen you reference anything but kill the puppy music. 

Do you think I listen to nothing but Cannibal Corpse or something?  

I saw them at Mayhem Fest in Dallas in 2009 along with Manson, Slayer, All That Remains, Killswitch Engage, Job for a Cowboy, Behemoth, Whitechapel, Trivium, God Forbid and Bullet for my Valentine. It was a pretty interesting show, to say the least.

http://www.last.fm/festival/916190+Rockstar+Mayhem+Festival

It was three stages, so of course I didn't get to see all of them. I scratched the ones that I missed. I would imagine that would be hell for a lot of people on here to endure all day. LOL 

And, I agree. This is just awful:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzz0YVEgT5U

I had to go check them out out for a couple of songs while I was there though, just  to see it.

Are you reefering to the exhibit at the Creation Museum, naughtyboy?

No, I normally reefer at home on the weekends, doucheyboy.

Thanks for conceding that you don't have the very first clue about science and can only try to argue isolated elements becuase you aren't bright enough to  grasp that complex systems don't react in a linear fashion to isolated inputs.  If you were smart enough to use this 'Google' thing you've heard such great things about, you'd already know that carbon levels were much lower in the Precambrian than during the Cambrian, and again much lower (like, today's levels) in the mid-Paleozoic and early Mesozoic before rising again to 5X today's levels in the mid-Mesozoic.

You're the kid who just couldn't understand why fluids don't actually move in a laminar fashion.  Turbulence is over your head from what you're posting here. 

If you were intelligent enough to acually apply this 'science' thing you're pretending to know, then you'd be able to conclude that historically high carbon levels do not create a runaway greenhouse effect and that something causes it to self-correct over time.  This ability is what separates the kids who graduated from real universities from the 'christmas grads'.

Dummy.     


  

Thanks for conceding that you don't have the very first clue about science and can only try to argue isolated elements becuase you aren't bright enough to  grasp that complex systems don't react in a linear fashion to isolated inputs.  If you were smart enough to use this 'Google' thing you've heard such great things about, you'd already know that carbon levels were much lower in the Precambrian than during the Cambrian, and again much lower (like, today's levels) in the mid-Paleozoic and early Mesozoic before rising again to 5X today's levels in the mid-Mesozoic.

You're the kid who just couldn't understand why fluids don't actually move in a laminar fashion.  Turbulence is over your head from what you're posting here. 

If you were intelligent enough to acually apply this 'science' thing you're pretending to know, then you'd be able to conclude that historically high carbon levels do not create a runaway greenhouse effect and that something causes it to self-correct over time.  This ability is what separates the kids who graduated from real universities from the 'christmas grads'.

---

***lost in the Cambrian forests***

***lost in the Cambrian forests***

***conceding he's way over his head in this argument and has lost***


  

...he's way over his head ...

---

Why your infatuation with paleology?   Why are you so very uninterested with the present and future?

Where is all the CO2 from the ancient atmosphere? Specifically, how much is incorporated in today's living plants, and how much is preserved, as fossilized ancient plants. Earth's carbonate minerals are not in play with the atmosphere (short of being decomposed by acids or volcanism). What is the concentration/solublity of H2CO3 <> H+ + HCO3- in today's sea water, excluding that, which is produced by carbonic anhydrase of plankton?

What happens to the C and O atoms, which are within the molecular structures of living and fossilized plants (and animals, for that matter) when they die and decompose, or they are burned?

If the C and O of plants is returned to the atmosphere (whether by burning or decomposition) will water vapor also be produced? Will the CO2 and H2O convert the increasing electromagnetic radiation form the Sun into thermal energy on Earth's surface? Is there some heat buffer on the planet, or will the temperature rise (given that the specific heat of water is 1cal/g/degree Celsius)? Or, are you claiming that there's some magic system, like that in the bodies of raped women, which prevents the rape from concieving a baby?

meaningless babble that leaves your original hypothesis alone with its failing grade in junior year high school science.  We all knew you couldn't admit your glaring error, so don't worry.  Go ahead and post something else meaningless in another attempt to deflect.

meaningless babble that leaves your original hypothesis alone with its failing grade in junior year high school science.  We all knew you couldn't admit your glaring error, so don't worry.  Go ahead and post something else meaningless in another attempt to deflect.

---

***gets all his answers from Ask Jeeves***

***gets all his answers from Ask Jeeves***

***Wikipedia know-nothing exposed for the intellectual poseur he truly is.***

***Wikipedia know-nothing exposed for the intellectual poseur he truly is.***

---

***met his wife while hiking in a lush forest during the Cambrian Period***

[http://bp3.blogger.com/_orkXxp0bhEA
/RsdfkGpycYI/AAAAAAAABA0/tw3Rc-vZcS
M/s1600-h/070818-newsweek-cooling-1
.jpg]




You guys need to get with the program.  This Global Warming is a disingenuous attempt to discredit President Jimmy Carter's Legacy.





Shame on y'all! 

naughtyboy:

1. Is not a central premise of your recent nonsensical spewfest that, since the level of atmospheric CO2 was much higher during the Cambrian Period, and the average surface temperature was lower (both compared to the levels today), that, today, we should be unconcerned with the exploding level of CO2?

2. Are you a hippie Gaia-nut that thinks that, since the Earth has been lurching from one geophysical extreme to another, that the planet's temperature will regulate itself?

3. Are you a professiional shill for an enegy enterprise? 

My Hero!

Can you imagine waking up on day, your ex-President Jimmy Carter, and your entire Administration is viewed, even by your own party secretly, as a waste of air?

Can you imagine waking up on day, your ex-President Jimmy Carter, and your entire Administration is viewed, even by your own party secretly, as a waste of air?

---

Can you imagine a class of idiots so stupid that they voted Cheney/Bush twice, Palin/McClown, and then Mittney/Ryan?

I am so stupid.  I was told if I voted for Obama's opponents, things would get worse in this Country.  Sure as ****, I did vote against him twice and it did.










I spologize.   

Looks like that Keystone pipeline is cleared for lift-off. Who really believs the POTUS doesn't back it eventually? The unions will love it, the libs will blame Bush, the cons will try to convine the nation that this is a good thing and the band will play on.

***met his wife while hiking in a lush forest during the Cambrian Period***   

***Can't figure out why third wife spends an hour every day 'tutoring' the pool boy, when they don't have a pool***   



   

***Can't figure out why third wife spends an hour every day 'tutoring' the pool boy, when they don't have a pool***   

---

naughtyboy: 

1. Is not a central premise of your recent nonsensical spewfest that, since the level of atmospheric CO2 was much higher during the Cambrian Period, and the average surface temperature was lower (both compared to the levels today), that, today, we should be unconcerned with the exploding level of CO2?

2. Are you a hippie Gaia-nut that thinks that, since the Earth has been lurching from one geophysical extreme to another, that the planet's temperature will regulate itself?

3. Are you still a professional shill for an enegy enterprise? 

4. During the previous, major temperature boundary oscillations, how have the extant lifeforms fared?

Please attempt to bombast your way through at least one of these perfectly apt questions, you jesusfreak blowhard.