Here ya go, SECFAN - Fla/Louisville

Come on--who gives a c*** that the SEC added two teams--at the time that it happened most people thought they were both going to be patsies.  So, let's get back to reality.

That's not the point red.  You don't get it.  Adding 2 teams gives ANY conference more chances to get MORE teams ranked.  Get it?


The SEC has since taken over and yet even now the erosion is starting.  You still contend that only 2 of 6 SEC teams in the top 10  lost their bowl games.  Hey I agree but that's 1/3 of the teams. 


Are you serious?  First, what other conference had 6 teams ranked in the top 10.  That leaves 4 teams.  ND lost.  ORE won.  STAN won.  KAN ST lost.  When the dust settled, using your logic, we can say 100% of the BIG 12 teams ranked in the top 10 LOST.  We could also say 100% of the BIG 12 teams ranked in the top 11, LOST.


And two of the usually "dominant" teams lost to lesser/weaker teams.  Why is that so hard to accept?

It is easy to accept.  That does NOT mean that the SEC is down this year as you contend.  FLA has NOT been dominant since the 2009 season. Losing bowl games equate to a conference being down, especially given the fact that 4 other top 10 SEC teams won their bowl games, including ALA winning the BCS NC game.  

Does the fact that the B1G Champ, WIS and the B1G runner-up NEB losing their bowl games, mean the entire B1G is down?

Never mind?  The B1G is down.  Maybe you are on to something.



That doesn't mean that overall the conference isn't down/slipping.  That's all I'm sayiing.



Once again, other than your convoluted logic that the SEC is down because FLA and LSU lost, how in the world is the SEC down when compared to recent years?  More teams ranked in the top 10.  7 teams ranked overall, a 6-3 bowl record.  What recent year was better to put 2012 in the down/slipping category?